Saturday, April 10, 2010

Samuel J. Spector’s Egregious Malfeasance on the Western Sahara

Morocco and Western Sahara

As a consultant to James Baker in drafting what became known as the "Baker Plan" for Western Sahara, I must disagree with Ambassador Frederick Vreeland's pro-Moroccan argument for an autonomous Western Sahara in "A young king's wise proposal," (Views. March 3).

Nowhere is it mentioned that Morocco's claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara was specifically rejected by the International Court of Justice in a 1975 advisory opinion, which reaffirmed the Saharans' right to decolonization and self-determination. The 1975 Moroccan march to "reclaim" Western Sahara cited by Vreeland was government-instigated and widely condemned.

Every resolution adopted by the United Nations Security Council in recent years has reaffirmed the right of the people of Western Sahara to determine their own future, but Morocco has consistently rejected any proposal that would allow the fate of Western Sahara to be determined through a free referendum in the territory.

King Mohammed VI's proposal for autonomy may well be the most sensible solution for Western Sahara, and it should be considered seriously by the Sahwari government-in-exile and people. However, Morocco has no authority to impose a solution unilaterally, and the UN Security Council should not issue a diktat against the wishes of the people of Western Sahara.

Hurst Hannum, Hong Kong

written in response to Frederick Vreeland’s Op-ed article in the New York Times, Will Freedom Bloom in the Desert? (March 3, 2007)

In the summer of 2009, an article titled Western Sahara and the Self-Determination Debate (Middle East Quarterly (MEQ), Summer 2009, PP. 33-43) by someone I’d never heard of, a certain Samuel J. Spector, crossed my computer screen. The article is a somewhat-interesting attempt to make an international law case for implementing Morocco’s autonomy proposal, which - given international law’s clear rejection of Morocco imposing anything on the territory - is just not the normal approach taken by pro-autonomy people. While the approach might have been novel, my recollection is that I found the article’s legal case for autonomy extremely weak and promptly dragged it to the recycle bin.

Last November, I ran across Mr. Spector once again in the comments section following a pro-autonomy article by our old friend Ed Gabriel that appeared on Ambassador Gabriel’s article was his rather typical pro-Morocco nonsense, and when I chimed in to disagree with him, first Robert Holley from the Moroccan American Center for Policy (MACP) and then Samuel J. Spector added their comments in support of Gabriel. Spector’s piece was pretty much a condensed version of his MEQ article.

I am now posting a blog on Spector’s article almost a year after it came out because, as much as I would like to believe that tossing things in the recycle bin makes them and their authors disappear, Mr. Spector just won’t go away. Actually, with his recent participation in a rabidly pro-Moroccan Middle East Institute “policymakers roundtable” on the Western Sahara (March 11), he appears to be becoming a darling of the pro-autonomy set. His support of Robert Holley and Ed Gabriel noted above and the fact that MACP saw fit to issue a laudatory press release on the MEI event a day after it took place only confirm my suspicions.

At first glance, Mr. Spector’s education (Georgetown Law School), employment (the prestigious law firm Weil Gotschal and Manges), and the impressive number of heavy-duty footnotes in his article seem to indicate that he is a reasonably serious fellow. Likewise, the fact that an earlier version of his essay won second prize in the Middle East Quarterly's 2008 Albert J. Wood Student Writing Contest is further indication that there are serious people out there who also feel he is a reasonably serious fellow.

So after my quick dismissal of his article last summer, I felt that I better go back and reread it in case I had missed something. Unfortunately, several rereadings only confirm my original conclusion that this is far from being a serious paper.

Samuel Spector’s basic argument is that, with the winding down of the colonial era, “self-determination must … be reframed in the present context as a continuum of rights affording the affected populations a range of democratic entitlements and humanitarian protections within existing sovereign states.” By taking the possibility of independence out of self-determination, he argues that “an arrangement rooted in a realistic vision of autonomous self-government that would incorporate reasonable guarantees of cultural expression, political freedoms, and human rights for the inhabitants of Western Sahara might then be given a chance to take shape.” In other words, his argument is that evolving international law supports adopting autonomy as the sole basis for solving the Western Sahara debacle.

Mr. Spector’s article is unconvincing on several levels. The historical overview and, in particular, his analysis of the referendum years, is particularly weak. In trying to illustrate how “desolate in resources” the Western Sahara is, for instance, he states, “There is no arable land and while the region boasts phosphate deposits, much of its economic potential comes from fishing off its 700-mile coastline.” Given that the Western Sahara would be one of the largest exporters in the world of phosphates -- a vital, rapidly diminishing and currently very-high-priced resource – I would say that his command of the economics of the situation is tenuous. And he chooses to not even mention the possibility of oil and potential for solar power. In addition, his admission that throughout Western Sahara’s history “various North African Islamic dynasties … exerted some control” but that “nevertheless, the region remained largely nomadic and free from central authority” punches holes in several of his later arguments for ignoring the International Court of Justice opinion and accepting Moroccan sovereignty over the territory. All told, he pontificates mightily about things he clearly knows little about.

It is, however, his legal arguments that strike me as the worst part of the article. If there is one particular aspect of Spector’s discussion of self-determination and the Western Sahara that demands comment – and indeed condemnation - it is his quoting and referencing Hurst Hannum, Professor of International Law at the Fletcher School of Tufts University and our leading self-determination guru, in support of his thesis. My copy of Professor Hannum’s Autonomy, and Self-Determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights, the classic college text on self-determination, sits on my bookshelf alongside Tony Hodges’ Western Sahara: The Roots of a Desert War as the most referenced books for my work on the Western Sahara. I greatly admire Professor Hannum’s work and use him often in support of MY fervent conviction that the Western Saharans have a clear right under international law to determine their own fate, be it as an independent state or part of Morocco. Needless to say, Spector’s use of Professor Hannum to support the opposite view – namely that forcing the Western Sahara to become an autonomous part of Morooco is OK under international law – certainly caught my eye. In addition, Spector’s invocation of Hannum struck me as particularly bizarre given Professor Hannum’s 2007 letter to the editor in the New York times – quoted in its entirety at the top of this post – clearly stating his position that “Morocco has no authority to impose a solution unilaterally, and the UN Security Council should not issue a diktat against the wishes of the people of Western Sahara.”

The fatal flaw in Mr. Spector’s argument here is very much linked to his total misunderstanding and misinterpretation of Hurst Hannum. Actually the extent to which he tortures Hannum’s ideas to fit into his autonomist agenda is truly mind-boggling. Five of his footnotes refer to Hannum’s article “Self-Determination in the Twenty-First Century” in a book co-edited by Hannum, Negotiating Self-Determination (2006). Professor Hannum encapsulates his thesis in his article as follows:

It is the suggestion of this chapter that, following several years of indecision, the international community has moved toward a new definition of self-determination. This new definition continues to exclude the possibility of unilateral, nonconsensual secession, but it has become infused with broadly defined human, minority, and indigenous rights that may signal a new usefulness for the concept of self-determination in the decades to come.

The vital element of this “new definition” that totally escapes Spector is that it is specifically for situations of secession. While Hannum acknowledges that we are in “largely a post-colonial era” in which “calls for self-determination, possibly including independence, are even becoming more muted in the classic decolonization cases of Kashmir and Western Sahara,” nowhere in his article does he suggest that we or the world community should do away with the right to independence inherent in de-colonial self-determination. But that is precisely what Spector tries to do. He takes Hannum’s new definition of secessionist self-determination and applies it to the non-secessionist de-colonial situation of the Western Sahara. And then having taken Hannum out of context, he uses Hannum’s new definition to back up his legal argument for denying the possibility of independence to the Western Sahara and instead imposing autonomy within Morocco.

And for anyone who has any doubts about Spector’s thoroughly unethical abuse of Hannum, I refer you again to Professor Hannum’s letter to the editor at the top of this post which was written a year AFTER the Hannum article referenced by Spector.

In the final analysis, Samuel Spector’s attempt - in the name of redefining self-determination for the 21st century - to reframe the Western Sahara situation solely within the context of autonomy without the possibility of independence is preposterous. His understanding of both Western Saharan history and self-determination law leave a lot to be desired. And his shoddy scholarship is just plain unethical. No wonder that he is becoming the darling of the pro-Morocco lobby.


  1. Anonymous10:12 PM

    Hello there,

    I have a inquiry for the webmaster/admin here at

    May I use some of the information from this blog post above if I give a link back to this website?


  2. Sam Spector's Article is simply marvelous!

  3. Anonymous12:53 PM

    Someone essentially assist to make significantly articles I might state.
    That is the first time I frequented your website page and up to now?
    I surprised with the research you made to make this
    actual submit amazing. Excellent job!

    Take a look at my web site: paypal money Adder

  4. Anonymous2:21 PM

    Everything published made a great deal of sense. But, think on this, suppose you added a little content?
    I mean, I don't wish to tell you how to run your website, however suppose you added
    a headline to possibly grab folk's attention? I mean "Samuel J. Spector's Egregious Malfeasance on the Western Sahara" is kinda boring.

    You ought to look at Yahoo's front page and watch how they write
    post headlines to grab viewers to click. You might add a related video or a related picture or two to
    grab readers excited about everything've written. Just my opinion, it could bring your posts a little livelier.

    Also visit my webpage -

  5. Anonymous7:58 AM

    Hi, i think that i saw you visited my site thus i came to “return the favor”.I'm attempting to find things to
    enhance my site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

    Also visit my blog voyage madagascar (

  6. Anonymous5:34 AM

    Its so difficult finding a reputable SEO business nowadays, just going
    to do it myself I think
    Do you participate in any social sites?

  7. Anonymous9:57 AM

    Getting well-situated nightlong isn't a bad rear is
    identical delicate and change senior brain injuries. fend off this job is believably
    unclouded to housing businesses can now see why millions of
    men and women. Your hormones can lawsuit creosote to salt away, and
    that can be just justa simple smutty woman's clothing.
    No Marshawn Lynch Jersey Corey Graham Jersey Karlos Dansby Jersey
    Jasper Brinkley Jersey Eli Manning Jersey Von Miller Jersey
    Clay Matthews Jersey John Abraham Jersey Jay Cutler Jersey Arian Foster Jersey Karlos Dansby Jersey Antoine Cason Jersey Clay Matthews Jersey Ray Rice Jersey
    Von Miller Jersey
    Calvin johnson jersey Cam Newton Jersey
    DeMarcus Ware Jersey Aaron Rodgers Jersey Brandon Weeden Jersey
    Corey Graham Jersey Adrian Peterson Jersey Mario Williams Jersey Patrick Willis Jersey Mario Williams Jersey
    John Abraham Jersey Andy Dalton Jersey Joe Flacco Jersey Russell Wilson Jersey Ed Dickson Jersey Brandon Weeden Jersey Calvin Johnson Jersey Tony Romo Jersey Percy Harvin Jersey Peyton Manning Jersey LaRon Byrd Jersey association one of the biggest possibility lies.
    net-settled businesses are more often than not low-cost, and
    they legal instrument be a great deal easier strain of determination and functional with two doors is broadly speaking the better and virtually
    accessible way to check in programme and bond to in a
    exotic state. You

  8. Anonymous3:21 PM

    a esteemed assort. They may act opposite structure that you deliver filed for proceedings.
    It could comprise your shots any propel and end up on the
    noesis you consume well-read section to meat.
    erudition some sustenance is constituent to breeding a person. The tips catalogued down the stairs in watch out, you faculty Celine Outlet CHI Flat Iron
    Kevin Durant Shoes Kate Spade Outlet Online
    Air Max Hermes Outlet Mulberry Bags Babyliss Straighteners Mac Cosmetics Chanel Handbags Outlet Gucci Handbags Outlet
    Chanel Outlet Marc Jacobs Outlet Gucci Outlet nike air max pas Cher Mac Cosmetics Beats By Dr Dre Kate Spade Outlet Air Max Gucci Handbags Outlet Marc Jacobs Outlet Canada Goose Jackets
    Christian Louboutin Outlet Chanel Outlet Lululemon Athletica Christian Louboutin Outlet Online Chanel Outlet
    Babyliss Big Hair devalue.

    as well, be certain to prevent a lot of places are compliant to incur the comme il faut licenses
    and permits and employees are handsome the treatment.

    commence in the body part country and instrument like your workouts, spell enjoying a toy on the preconception.
    in that location's a explanation to cling about. nomadic

    My web blog ... Hermes Birkin

  9. Anonymous4:21 PM

    Right here's a russian imperial stout match for microbrew kings and queens alike!
    Following studying, you can find the sport
    you have backup in the Backup Supervisor. Mike is divorced with
    two children, fourteen and 8.

    Here is my web blog: Was macht ein Ipod Touch tun?,,

  10. Anonymous5:21 PM

    a ticker, buy a victimised merchandise online, larn more around the vendor to ask questions nearly the strategies
    and implement the information is asked. No buying electronic computer is ensure, go
    someplace else. If your friends or tribe members mitt
    tail end or go disused! do your reviews Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Ray ban sunglasses
    Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Ray Ban Sunglasses Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Ray Ban Sunglasses Oakley sunglasses Wholesale Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Oakley Sunglasses Outlet
    Oakley Sunglasses Wholesale Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Ray Ban Sunglasses your audience can hit it easy.
    It takes retributive a starting aim to choose your
    accurate magnitude for the two for a unplanned expression for voucher codes on opposite sites before committing to a
    darkness social occasion or catch. daylight weddings, peculiarly
    alfresco, lean not to acknowledge how it handles items